https://doi.org/10.4081/ijwc.2023.101
Ulcera terminale di Kennedy e lesione da pressione: due differenti profili di responsabilità professionale per una lesione uguale
Ricevuto: 26 aprile 2023
Accettato: 9 giugno 2023
Published: 25 luglio 2023
Accettato: 9 giugno 2023
Abstract Views: 562
PDF (English): 255
PDF: 249
PDF: 249
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Autori
La recente giurisprudenza prevede un contenzioso svantaggioso con una forte soccombenza per negligenza inerente le ulcere da pressione, anche quando queste sono lesioni di fine vita non diagnosticate correttamente come l’ulcera terminale di Kennedy e, quindi, patologie inguaribili che non prevedono una responsabilità professionale. Gli autori analizzano sia la giurisprudenza disponibile degli ultimi 15 anni in materia di decessi attribuibili anche in parte a lesioni da pressione, che cartelle cliniche disponibili, evidenziando le differenze tra queste due problematiche, focalizzando il differente aspetto di responsabilità professionale e le attuali “tendenze” giuridiche.
Ayello EA, Jeffrey ML, Diane L, et al. Reexamining the literature on terminal ulcers, SCALE, skin failure, and unavoidable pressure injuries. Adv Skin Wound Care 2019;32:109-21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000553112.55505.5f
Alvarez OM, Brindle CT, Langemo K, et al. The VCU Pressure Ulcer Summit. The search for a clearer understanding and more precise clinical definition of the unavoidable pressure injury. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2016;43:1-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000276
Sibbald RG, Krasner DL, Lutz J. SCALE: Skin Changes at Life’s End: final consensus statement: October 1, 2009. Adv Skin Wound Care 2010;23:225–36.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000363537.75328.36
Krasner DL, Stewart TP. SCALE wounds: unavoidable pressure injury. Wounds 2015;27:92–4
Milne CT, Corbett LQ, Bubuc DL, eds. Wound, ostomy, and continence nursing secrets. Philadelphia, PA: Hanley & Belfus Inc; 2003: p. 198-9.
Gardner WJ. Prevention and treatment of bedsores; an air mattress accomplishing alternation of pressure points. J Am Med Assoc 1948;138:583.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1948.62900080001008
Zang K, Chen B, Wang M, et al. The effect of early mobilization in critically ill patients: A meta-analysis. Nurs Crit Care 2020;25:360-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12455
Alderden JG, Shibily F, Cowan L. Best Practice in Pressure Injury Prevention Among Critical Care Patients. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2020 Dec;32(4):489-500. doi: 10.1016/j.cnc.2020.08.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnc.2020.08.001
EPUAP, NPUAP, PPPIA. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers. Clinical Practice Guideline. The intrnational guideline ed. 2019
Langemo DK. The hot seat: the reality of skin failure. 18th Annual Clinical Symposium on Advances in Skin & Wound Care. Chicago, IL 2003.
Sibbald RG, Krasner DL, Lutz. J. SCALE: Skin Changes at Life's End: Final Consensus Statement: October 1, 2009. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2010 May;23(5):225-36.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000363537.75328.36
Kennedy KL. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in an intermediate care facility. Decubitus 1989;2:44-5.
Ayello EA, Levine JM, Langemo D, et al. Reexamining the Literature on Terminal Ulcers, SCALE, Skin Failure, and Unavoidable Pressure Injuries. Adv Skin Wound Care 2019;32:109-21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000553112.55505.5f
Hanson D, Langemo DK, Olson B, et al. The prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers in the hospice setting: analysis of two methodologies. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 1991;8:18-22
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104990919100800506
Langemo DK, Brown G. Skin fails too: acute, chronic, and end-stage skin failure. Adv Skin Wound Care 2006;19:206-11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00129334-200605000-00014
Schank JE. Kennedy terminal ulcer: the "ah-ha!" moment and diagnosis. Ostomy Wound Manage 2009;55:40-4.
Codice di Procedura Penale, art. 533.
Taylor JS. Malpractice implications of pressure ulcers. Adv Wound Care 1994;7:43-4, 46, 48-9.
Hastings KE. Legal aspects of the pressure ulcer guidelines. Decubitus 1991;4:36-8.
Meehan M, Hill WM. Pressure ulcers in nursing homes: does negligence litigation exceed available evidence? Ostomy Wound Manage 2002;48:46-54.
Anders J, Heinemann A, Leffmann C, et al. Decubitus ulcers: pathophysiology and primary prevention. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010;107:371-81; quiz 382.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2010.0371
Hastings KE. Legal aspects of the pressure ulcer guidelines. Decubitus 1991;4:36-8.
Edsberg LE, Langemo D, Baharestani MM, et al. Unavoidable pressure ulcer injury: state of the science and consensus outcomes. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2014;41:313-34 .
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000050
Gibelli F, Bailo P, Sirignano A, Ricci G. Pressure ulcers from the medico-legal perspective: A case report and literature review. Healthcare 2022;10:1426.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081426
Brown AM. Clinical negligence claims for pressure injuries from the perspective of a tissue viability medico-legal nurse expert. Br J Community Nurs 2022;27:S14-S20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2022.27.Sup9.S14
Pascall E, Trehane SJ, Georgiou A, Cook TM. Litigation associated with intensive care unit treatment in England: an analysis of NHSLA data 1995-2012. Br J Anaesth 2015;115:601-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev285
Cass. pen. Sez. II, Sent., (ud. 06/12/2012) 08-03-2013, n. 10994.
Cass. civ. Sez. III, Ord., (ud. 18/05/2018) 27-09-2018, n. 23164.
Cass. civ. Sez. III, Ord., (ud. 26/09/2019) 08-11-2019, n. 28823.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/opj.2019.98B004
Come citare
Garcea, R., & Savelli, P. (2023). Ulcera terminale di Kennedy e lesione da pressione: due differenti profili di responsabilità professionale per una lesione uguale. Italian Journal of Wound Care, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/ijwc.2023.101
Copyright (c) 2023 Gli Autori
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Articoli simili
- Riccardo Garcea, Il consenso nel wound care: analisi della giurisprudenza e proposta di un modello per singolo trattamento , Italian Journal of Wound Care: V. 4 N. 2 (2020)
- Roberto Anichini, Enrico Brocco, Marco Cavallini, Roberto Da Ros, Luigi Uccioli, Ciro Pempinello, Elisabetta Salutini, Maurizio Volpini, Alice Volpini, Luca Monge, Grey-zone nel trattamento del paziente con Piede Diabetico. I risultati di una Delphi survey italiana multidisciplinare condivisa tra esperti , Italian Journal of Wound Care: V. 4 N. 2 (2020)
- Giuseppe Nebbioso, Ciro Falasconi, Viviana Nebbioso, Francesco Petrella, Dolore e lesioni croniche cutanee , Italian Journal of Wound Care: V. 4 N. 1 (2020)
- Giovanni Petracca, Francesco Zappia, Giuseppe Maccarone , Fascite necrotizzante: caso clinico , Italian Journal of Wound Care: V. 5 N. 2 (2021)
- Paola Leonardelli, Rachele Stelzer, Paziente con lesioni cutanee in cure domiciliari: Consulenza dell’infermiere esperto in wound care. Definire e uniformare il processo a livello territoriale , Italian Journal of Wound Care: V. 6 N. 2 (2022)
Puoi anche Iniziare una ricerca avanzata di similarità per questo articolo.
