https://doi.org/10.4081/ijwc.2024.111

Uso del dispositivo Lumiheal nel trattamento di ferite contaminate

V. 8 N. 1 (2024)
Ricevuto: 14 febbraio 2024
Accettato: 20 maggio 2024
Published: 31 maggio 2024
Biophotonics, fluorescence biomodulation, photobiomodulation, phototherapy
Abstract Views: 184
PDF (English): 118
Supplementary Materials: 24
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Autori

Elia Ricci
eliaricci@tin.it
Unità di Vulnologia, Policlinico di Monza, Clinica S. Rita di Vercelli, Clinica Eporediese di Ivrea, Italy.
Monica Pittarello
Unità di Vulnologia, Policlinico di Monza, Clinica S. Rita di Vercelli, Clinica Eporediese di Ivrea, Italy.

Studio osservazionale su pazienti con ferite croniche degli arti inferiori colonizzate o criticamente colonizzate trattate con biofotonterapia. Sono stati arruolati dieci pazienti con ulcere venose o infiammatorie. Tutti i pazienti arruolati sono stati trattati una volta alla settimana con una doppia applicazione della terapia. Il periodo di trattamento è stato di 6 settimane e la valutazione finale è stata eseguita a 12 settimane. I dati raccolti sono stati: valutazione della carica batterica con il sistema Moleculight; e carica batterica con metodo semiquantitativo tramite tampone secondo Levine. Sono stati studiati quattro tipi di batteri: Stafilococchi, Pseudomonas, Enterococchi e Proteus. Misurazione del pH e valutazione del punteggio di Cutting e Harding per le infezioni. I risultati mostrano una buona performance nel controllo del bioburden e una riduzione dei segni clinici in 2 settimane. Il punto secondario era la riduzione del dolore e il miglioramento del tessuto perilesionale. La riduzione dell'area è stata inferiore nelle ferite di eziologia venosa di quasi il 40% e un tasso di guarigione del 33%, un risultato buono ma inferiore nelle ferite infiammatorie. Gli autori ipotizzano una marcata attività sui fattori legati all'infiammazione locale.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Nikolis A, Grimard D, Pesant Y, et al. A prospective case series evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Klox BioPhotonic System in venous leg ulcers. Chronic Wound Care Manag Res 2016:3:101-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CWCMR.S104391
Romanelli M, Piaggesi A, Scapagnini G, et al. Evaluation of fluorescence biomodulation in the real-life management of chronic wounds: the EUREKA trial. J Wound Care 2018;27:744-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2018.27.11.744
Sutherland JC. Biological effects of polychromatic light. Photochem Photobiol 2002;76:164–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2002)076<0164:BEOPL>2.0.CO;2
Kim HP. Lightening up light therapy: Activation of retrograde signaling pathway by photobiomodulation. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 2014;22:491–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2014.083
Huang YY, Sharma SK, Carroll J, Hamblin MR. Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy - an update. Dose Response 2011;9:602–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.11-009.Hamblin
Fathabadie FF, Bayat M, Amini A, et al. Effects of pulsed infra-red low level-laser irradiation on mast cells number and degranulation in open skin wound healing of healthy and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2013;15:294–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2013.764435
AlGhamdi KM, Kumar A, Moussa NA. Low-level laser therapy: a useful technique for enhancing the proliferation of various cultured cells. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:237–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0885-2
Enwemeka CS, Parker JC, Dowdy DS, et al. The efficacy of low-power lasers in tissue repair and pain control: a meta-analysis study. Photomed Laser Surg 2004;22:323–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/1549541041797841
Mittermayr R, Osipov A, Piskernik C, et al. Blue laser light increases perfusion of a skin flap via release of nitric oxide from hemoglobin. Mol Med 2007;13:22–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2119/2006-00035.Mittermayr
Jenkins ML, O'Neal E. Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence in acute care. Adv Skin Wound Care 2010;23:556-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000391184.43845.c1
Margolis DJ, Bilker W, Santanna J, Baumgarten M. Venous leg ulcer: incidence and prevalence in the elderly. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46:381–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2002.121739
Kirsner RS, Vivas AC. Lower-extremity ulcers: diagnosis and manage¬ment. Br J Dermatol 2015;173:379–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13953
Jones KR, Fennie K, Lenihan A. Evidence-based management of chronic wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care 2007;20:591–600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000284936.32707.8d
Oliverio J, Gero E, Whitacre KL, Rankin J. Wound care algorithm: diagnosis and treatment. Adv Skin Wound Care 2016;29:65–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000473132.88076.af
Principles of best practice: Wound infection in clinical practice. An international consensus. London: MEP Ltd, 2008. Available from www.mepltd.co.uk
Natarajan S, Williamson D, Stiltz AJ, Harding K. Advances in wound care and healing technology. Am J Clin Dermatol 2000;1:269–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200001050-00002
De Freitas LF, Hamblin MR. Proposed mechanisms of photobiomodu¬lation or low-level light therapy. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2016;22:7000417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2561201
Enwemeka CS, Parker JC, Dowdy DS, et al. The efficacy of low-power lasers in tissue repair and pain control: a meta-analysis study. Photomed Laser Surg 2004;22:323–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/1549541041797841
Armstrong DG, Edmonds ME, Serena TE. Point-of-care fluorescence imaging reveals extent of bacterial load in diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J 2023;20:554-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14080
Rondas AALM, Schols JMGA, Halfens RJG, Stobberingh EE. Swab versus biopsy for the diagnosis of chronic infected wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care 2013;26:211-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000428984.58483.aa
Miller C, Karimi L, Donohue L, Kapp S. Interrater and intrarater reliability of silhouette wound imaging device. Adv Skin Wound Care 2012;25:513-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000422626.25031.b8
Cutting KF, Harding KG. Criteria for identifying wound infection. J Wound Care 1994;3:198-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.1994.3.4.198
Falanga V. Classification for wound bed preparation and stimulation of chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2000;8:347-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2000.00347.x
Breivick H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, et al. Assesment of pain. B J Anaesth 2008;101:17-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen103
Harries RL, Bosanquet DC, Harding KG. Wound bed preparation: TIME for an update. Int Wound J 2016;13:8–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12662

Come citare

Ricci, E., & Pittarello, M. (2024). Uso del dispositivo Lumiheal nel trattamento di ferite contaminate. Italian Journal of Wound Care, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/ijwc.2024.111
Copyright (c) 2024 Gli Autori Creative Commons License

Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.